4.3 Geomorphic and morphotectonic theory.Streams or rivers with a single channel and sinuosities of 1.5 or more are defined as meandering streams or rivers. The sinuosity of a watercourse is the ratio of the length of the channel to the straight line down-valley distance. The degree of meandering of the channel of a river, stream, or other watercourse is measured by its sinuosity. Over time, meanders migrate downstream, sometimes in such a short time as to create civil engineering challenges for local municipalities attempting to maintain stable roads and bridges. It typically ranges from 15 to 18 times the width of the channel.
The zone within which a meandering stream periodically shifts its channel is known as a meander belt. The result of this coupled erosion and sedimentation is the formation of a sinuous course as the channel migrates back and forth across the axis of a floodplain. It is produced as a watercourse erodes the sediments of an outer, concave bank ( cut bank) and deposits sediments on an inner, convex bank which is typically a point bar.
#Meander movie ending explained series#
There are no consequences to his actions, "even after admitting this." The movie ends as Bateman says: "there is no catharsis.The Jordan River, near the Dead Sea, 1937Ī meander is one of a series of regular sinuous curves in the channel of a river or other watercourse. By the end, the question of whether Bateman's murders really happened is irrelevant-no one would have noticed either way. Either he's done nothing, or his crimes have been of so little interest to his peers that they haven't caused a single ripple.
#Meander movie ending explained full#
His apartment full of corpses has been cleaned up. (The ATM that says FEED ME A STRAY CAT and the shootout with police that follows, for example.) An air of "did that really happen?" hangs over the entire story, until the only thing that's truly clear is that Bateman is utterly insane.įollowing a night of murder, a police manhunt, and a confession to his lawyer, Bateman attends a social occasion to find that nothing's changed. His body count is called into question as the story progresses and Bateman frequently experiences things that aren't real. As he told Vulture, "It allows people to make up their own mind of what it means."Įveryone around Bateman is as horrible as he is, save for the murderous tendencies-and Bateman may not even be a real murderer. As for the ambiguity of that last shot? Totally intentional. As he's said in multiple interviews, he was originally inspired by a nightmare in which he knew he was being followed, knew he couldn't get away, and knew the people with him in the nightmare weren't able to help him. Mitchell has only hinted at his personal point of view on the scene depicting the spirit's possible "death," but he's made it clear that he never set out to make a movie with a literal meaning, or one whose antagonist's motives were ever explained. Like plenty of thought-provoking cinema, much of It Follows is open to interpretation. In the film's final shot, the duo walk down a street while someone (or some thing?) follows behind. After the climactic conflict, Jay and her friend Paul (Keir Gilchrist) have sex.and later, Paul's seen driving past a group of prostitutes. One thing leads to another, and ultimately, she and her friends try killing it, with generally unpleasant (not to mention ambiguous) results. Jay's told the only way she can escape the evil spirit (which haunts her in some truly terrifying ways) is by sleeping with someone else to pass it on. But Mitchell uses it as the setup for a pretty devilish little film. If that sounds ridiculous, well, it kinda is on its face.
0 kommentar(er)
